Week 07-W
MLA Style - (Re?)Introduction
Some Resources:
Concerning Easybib, et al.
Concerning Easybib, et al.
The MLA 8 Practice Template
Let's Practice](https://www.youtube.com/embed/2bVAoVlFYf0)
Working with Sources
A lot of people were surprised by the verdict in the OJ trial. Most of America believed that OJ was guilty. Defense attorneys in LA did, too. Almost the entire defense bar believed that OJ was guilty, but they also felt that there was very little chance the jury would convict. The police and prosecutors made a bunch of mistakes, and the jury already didn't trust the cops. But people wanted to blame someone other than the police or the prosecutors, so misguided criticism fell on Judge Lance Ito.
Take a couple of minutes and look at the sample paragraph. What issues do you notice? What questions do you have?
Starting Point Why do we use sources in our writing? Why does it matter?
Readers Need…
Introducing Sources
Before you talk about a source, tell your reader a little bit about it:
In your groups, take a few minutes and add a sentence or two introducing the source to the beginning of this paragraph.
Providing Background
Before getting into detail, give your reader some context.
In your groups, add some background information to the paragraph (wherever you think best.)
Quoting and Citing
It's super important that we're clear about which ideas, and especially which words, are coming from the book--and where in the book they're coming from!
In your groups, go through the book and find the specific places where this writer is using Goffman's exact language, or referring to specific details in the book. Add citations and quotation marks where appropriate.
Giving Guidance
A lot of times, different people will look at the same information in different ways. Part of our job when we use sources is to make sure that our readers understand what we want them to see in our sources.
In your groups, write a sentence or two interpreting the stories in this paragraph. What might this writer want to say about these stories?
In Mistrial, by Mark Geragos and Pat Harris, the authors explain how the OJ Simpson trial changed the way people thought about the justice system. A lot of people were surprised by the verdict in the OJ trial. Most of America believed that OJ was guilty. Defense attorneys in LA like Geragos and Harris did, too. They write, "almost the entire defense bar believed that OJ was guilty, but they also felt that there was very little chance the jury would convict (Geragos and Harris 26). From their point of view, the police and prosecutors made a bunch of mistakes, and the jury already didn't trust the cops. However, "people wanted to blame someone other than the police or the prosecutors, so misguided criticism fell on Judge Lance Ito" (26). These examples show how the media in the OJ Simpson trial went against the purpose of deterrence, because someone who clearly committed a crime was allowed to get away with it.
Sharing Back
Make sure everybody's name is on your paragraph, and then pass them forward. We'll look through them all together.
Remember, readers need…
For Monday: